The purposes of the study were to determine how "an optimal herd" would be
structured with respect to its calvin:: pattern, average herdlife and calvi
ng interval, and to evaluate how sensitive the optimal solution was to chan
ges in input prices, which reflected the situation in Finland in 1998. The
study used Finnish input values in an optimization model developed for dair
y cow insemination and replacement decisions. The objective of the optimiza
tion model was to maximize the expected net present value from present and
replacement cows over a given decision horizon. In the optimal solution, th
e average net revenues per cow were highest in December and lowest in July,
due to seasonal milk: pricing. Based on the expected net present value of
a replacement heifer over the decision horizon, calving in September was op
timal. In the optimal solution, an average calving interval was 363 days an
d average herdlife after first calving was 48.2 months (i.e., approximately
4 complete lactations). However, there was a marked seasonal variation in
the length of a calving interval tit being longest in spring and early summ
er) that can be explained bg the goal of having more cows calving in the fa
ll. This, in turn, was due to seasonal milk pricing and higher production i
n the fall. In the optimal solution, total replacement percentage was 26, w
ith the highest Frequency of voluntary culling occurring at the end of the
year. Seasonal patterns in calving and replacement frequencies by calendar
month and variation in carving interval length or herdlife did not change m
eaningfully (<1%-2%) change in the output variables) with changes in calf,
carcass or feed prices. When the price of a replacement heifer decreased av
erage herdlife was shorter and replacement percentage increased. When the p
rice increased the effect was the opposite.