Biological variability of myoglobin in healthy elderly and younger subjects

Citation
A. Anesi et al., Biological variability of myoglobin in healthy elderly and younger subjects, AGING-CLIN, 12(3), 2000, pp. 168-172
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AGING-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
ISSN journal
03949532 → ACNP
Volume
12
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
168 - 172
Database
ISI
SICI code
0394-9532(200006)12:3<168:BVOMIH>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
To study the effect of age on serum myoglobin more clearly, the analytical, intra-individual and inter-individual components of variation were estimat ed from duplicate analyses of specimens collected from 18 healthy elderly s ubjects [ages 74-97 years; 9 men (EM)] and 14 healthy younger subjects [age s 25-31 years; 7 men (YM)] over a period of 6 weeks. The mean values (mu g/ L) were EM: 53.7; EW: 44.9; YM: 34.2; YW:24.8. Estimated analytical (CVA), intra- (CVI) and inter-individual (CVG) variations as CV% were: CVA: 2.2. C V,: EM: 13; EW: 9.9; YM: 12.4; YW: 9.6. CVI: EM: 37.6; EW: 28 YM: 18.5; YW: 13.4. The data obtained were used to derive the desirable analytical goal for imprecision (i.e., less than or equal to 6.5% in EM; less than or equal to 4.9% in EW and less than or equal to 6,2% in YM; less than or equal to 4.8% in YW); inaccuracy (i.e., less than or equal to 9.9% in EM; less than or equal to 7. 7 in EW and less than or equal to 5.5% in YM; less than or e qual to 4.12% in YW); the change required for serial results to be signific antly different (i.e., 36% in EM; 28% in EW and 34% in YM; 27.2% in YW), th e numbers of specimen collections required to produce a more precise estima te of the homeostatic set point of an individual within 5% (i.e., 26 in EM; 16 in EW and 24 in YM; 15 in YW), and the index of individuality (i.e., 0. 34 in EM; 0.35 in EW and 0.67 in YM; 0.71 in YW). This study shows that int ra-individual biological variation of myoglobin in healthy elderly subjects is not different from that in young subjects. Inter-individual variation, instead, is greatly influenced by differences in age and sex. (C) 2000, Edi trice Kurtis.