The present study explored the reliability and validity of a Spanish versio
n of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire (RCQ) (12-item short form) as it
might be used for opportunistic intervention. The test has three scales to
allocate patients to a stage of change: pre-contemplation (P), contemplati
on (C) or action (A). The RCQ was translated and back-translated prior to p
ilot administration to 15 patients. From two settings (a general hospital w
ard and a primary health care centre), 201 patients were identified as exce
ssive drinkers on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Patients k
nown to be alcohol-dependent and attending for alcohol-related reasons were
excluded. Patients completed the RCQ. Test-retest reliability after 2 days
was assessed in 35 patients. A components analysis was performed. Patients
were classified on RCQ scores to a stage of change. Two experts separately
interviewed the patients and made an allocation to stage of change, blind
to the RCQ score. Test-retest reliability was good (P: r = 0.81; C: r = 0.8
7; A: r = 0.86). Within the three scales, RCQ items showed fair consistency
in terms of Cronbach's alpha (P: 0.58, C: 0.75, A: 0.80). Component analys
is showed that together the scales accounted for 57.4% of the variance. The
experts agreed between themselves on patients' stage of change (weighted k
appa 0.92) but much less with the stage of change according to RCQ (expert
A, kappa = 0.44; expert B, kappa = 0.52). Omitting patients with low consum
ption did not improve internal reliability, and omitting those with low edu
cational level who might have filled in the questionnaire wrongly did not i
mprove internal reliability or agreement between RCQ and the experts. We co
nclude that the Spanish RCQ did not function efficiently in a population of
opportunistically identified excessive drinkers.