Risk of ovarian cancer in relation to estrogen and progestin dose and use characteristics of oral contraceptives

Citation
Rb. Ness et al., Risk of ovarian cancer in relation to estrogen and progestin dose and use characteristics of oral contraceptives, AM J EPIDEM, 152(3), 2000, pp. 233-241
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029262 → ACNP
Volume
152
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
233 - 241
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9262(20000801)152:3<233:ROOCIR>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Although past studies have shown that oral contraceptives with 50 mu g or m ore of estrogen reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, it is not clear whether newer, lower-dose formulations do as well. We conducted a population-based, case-control study in the Delaware Valley to assess the impact of dose of oral contraception on risk of ovarian cancer. Cases aged 20-69 years with a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer ascertained between May 1994 and Ju ly 1999 (n = 767) were compared with community controls (n = 1,367). Compar ed with never users, the adjusted risk of ovarian cancer was reduced by 40% for oral contraceptive users overall, with longer duration of use affordin g greater protection. The ovarian cancer risk reduction was similar for wom en who initiated oral contraception before 1972, when high-dose pills domin ated the market; between 1972 and 1980; and after 1980, when newer, lower-d ose pills dominated. Oral contraceptive estrogen and progestin content were compared for cases and controls after adjustment for current age, number o f pregnancies, race, and family history of ovarian cancer. Use of low-estro gen/low-progestin pills afforded an estimated risk reduction (odds ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.3, 0.6) that was identical to that for high -estrogen/high-progestin pills (odds ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.3, 0.7).