Rb. Ness et al., Risk of ovarian cancer in relation to estrogen and progestin dose and use characteristics of oral contraceptives, AM J EPIDEM, 152(3), 2000, pp. 233-241
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Although past studies have shown that oral contraceptives with 50 mu g or m
ore of estrogen reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, it is not clear whether
newer, lower-dose formulations do as well. We conducted a population-based,
case-control study in the Delaware Valley to assess the impact of dose of
oral contraception on risk of ovarian cancer. Cases aged 20-69 years with a
diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer ascertained between May 1994 and Ju
ly 1999 (n = 767) were compared with community controls (n = 1,367). Compar
ed with never users, the adjusted risk of ovarian cancer was reduced by 40%
for oral contraceptive users overall, with longer duration of use affordin
g greater protection. The ovarian cancer risk reduction was similar for wom
en who initiated oral contraception before 1972, when high-dose pills domin
ated the market; between 1972 and 1980; and after 1980, when newer, lower-d
ose pills dominated. Oral contraceptive estrogen and progestin content were
compared for cases and controls after adjustment for current age, number o
f pregnancies, race, and family history of ovarian cancer. Use of low-estro
gen/low-progestin pills afforded an estimated risk reduction (odds ratio =
0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.3, 0.6) that was identical to that for high
-estrogen/high-progestin pills (odds ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval:
0.3, 0.7).