Objectives To determine the effect of viewing conditions upon diagnosis of
early periapical inflammatory pathosis on intra-oral radiographs, and to ex
amine the effect of observer experience upon diagnostic performance in this
task.
Methods 50 observers examined 18 periapical radiographs using three differe
nt viewing conditions (room lighting; viewing box; viewing box with x2 magn
ification and masking). Their diagnoses were compared with an 'expert' diag
nosis provided by repeated viewings of the films by two dental radiologists
. Sensitivities and specificities were determined.
Results When 'ideal' viewing conditions were used, optimal sensitivity (78%
) and specificity (78%) were obtained. Use of a viewing box was associated
with significantly higher specificity than the use of room lighting (P = 0.
0016). Use of masking and x2 magnification was associated with significantl
y higher sensitivity than a viewing box alone (P = 0.004). There were few s
ignificant differences in diagnostic performance between observers, but qua
lified dental staff had significantly higher specificities than 4th year (P
= 0.01) and 5th year (P = 0.01) students when a viewing box was used alone
.
Conclusions This study on early periapical inflammatory pathosis gives supp
ort to guidelines which recommend the use of a viewing box, x2 magnificatio
n and masking for interpreting intra-oral radiographs. It also suggests tha
t observer experience may influence interpretation of early periapical path
osis.