Patient determinants of mental health interventions in primary care

Citation
R. Raine et al., Patient determinants of mental health interventions in primary care, BR J GEN PR, 50(457), 2000, pp. 620-625
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
ISSN journal
09601643 → ACNP
Volume
50
Issue
457
Year of publication
2000
Pages
620 - 625
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-1643(200008)50:457<620:PDOMHI>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Background. A large proportion of a general practitioner's (GP's) caseload comprises patients with mental health problems. It is important to ensure t hat care is provided appropriately, on the basis of clinical need. It is th erefore necessary to investigate the determinants of the use of mental heal th care in the primary care sector and, in particular, to identify any non- clinical characteristics of patients that affect the likelihood of their re ceiving appropriate care. Aim. To identify and compare the influence of non-clinical patient factors on GPs' acknowledgement of mental problems and on their provision of mental health care. Method Cross sectional study of adults aged 16 to 65 years old (n = 802) at tending one of eight practices (20 GPs in total) in inner west London. Results. Multivariable analysis showed that the combination of factors that best predict GPs' acknowledgement of the presence of mental problems are g eneral health questionnaire (GHQ) scores (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10 per unit i ncrease in score, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07 to 1.13), previous me ntal symptoms (OR = 7.5 95% CI = 4.3 to 129), increasing age (OR = 1.03 per one-year increase, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.04) and physical health status (OR = 0.98 per unit increase in short form-36 (SF-36) score, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1. 00). Multivariable analysis showed that the combination of factors that bes t predict intervention (prescription for psychotropic medication; return vi sit to GP; referral to psychiatric inpatients/outpatients; referral to othe r [specified] health professionals, or social services) are previous sympto ms (OR = 7.4, 95% CI = 3.8 to 14.4), white ethnic group (OR = 2.2 95% CI 0. 9 to 55); and not owning a property (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1 to 4.0). Life e vents influenced intervention only in the presence of low GHQ scores (OR = 8.1, 95% CI = 2.7 to 24.0). Conclusions. Mental problems are common in primary care and their acknowled gement is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for intervention. Our results show that GPs' decisions about mental health interventions can be i nfluenced by non-clinical patient factors, regardless of patients' clinical needs. The results suggest that current practice may not always be equitab le, and point to the need for better understanding of the basis of these po tential inequalities and for focused training.