Objective: To identify the reasons for the large variation in renal clearan
ce of mesalazine.
Design: Data were obtained from a randomised crossover bioequivalence study
in 18 healthy volunteers.
Methods: Participants received a single 1000mg oral dose of each of two dif
ferent formulations of prolonged release mesalazine (2 x 500mg tablets). Th
e formulations had similar dissolution profiles in phosphate buffer pH 6.8.
Plasma and urine mesalazine and acetylmesalazine concentrations were deter
mined by validated methods involving high performance liquid chromatography
analysis with mass spectrometric detection. Lower limits of quantification
were 50 mu g/L and 50 mu g/L in plasma and 0.25 mg/L and 2 mg/L in urine,
respectively.
Results: There was a large variability in the release and absorption of mes
alazine from both formulations and in the subsequent renal clearance of mes
alazine. There was a clear distinction (p = 0.0009) in renal clearance betw
een volunteers who showed slow mesalazine absorption with subsequent low cl
earance [0.006 to 0.5 L/h (0.1 to 8 ml/min)] and those who showed mon exten
sive absorption followed by higher renal clearance [0.5 to 6 L/h (8 to 100
ml/min)]. Active tubular reabsorption with a saturable maximum must be the
explanation for this difference in renal clearance. The metabolite acetylme
salazine is cleared renally via glomerular filtration and active tubular se
cretion, resulting in a clearance of 12 to 18 L/h (200 to 300 ml/min).
Conclusion: The renal clearance of mesalazine proceeds via the processes of
glomerular filtration and active tubular reabsorption. Tubular reabsorptio
n shows saturation at an area under the plasma concentration-time curve of
4 mg/L.h with an excreted amount of 2mg,, resulting in a threshold clearanc
e of 0.5 L/h (8 ml/min). This finding explains the dosage-dependent renal c
learance of mesalazine reported in the literature, but has no clear clinica
l implications.