Objective: To determine whether a computer-based method for recording stand
ardized assessment of neglect identifies abnormalities in the 'process' as
well as in the 'outcome' of such tasks.
Design: Prospective sequential assessment of patients admitted to a stroke
rehabilitation unit.
Subjects: All consecutive patients with right-sided cerebrovascular acciden
t confirmed on computerized tomography (CT) scan including 30 patients with
neglect, 57 patients without neglect. An age-matched control group of 13 s
ubjects.
Intervention: All patients were tested using the standard Rivermead Behavio
ural Inattention Test (BIT) and by computer recording of two standard tests
for assessing neglect (line bisection and Albert's test). Age-matched cont
rols were tested using computer recording of the two standard tests.
Main outcome measures: Neglect was defined using the BIT with a cut-off sco
re of 129. Computer recording measured the 'outcome' of tasks, i.e, the dev
iation from midline and omissions in cancellation, as well as the 'process'
of tasks, i.e. time between cancellations, components of cancellation time
including premovement, movement and drawing time, and the starting point f
or cancellation.
Results: The computer recording identified significant differences in 'outc
ome' and 'process' which distinguished neglect from non-neglect patients. T
here were significant differences between non-neglect patients and age-matc
hed controls with regard to 'process' measures but not with regard to 'outc
ome' measures.
Conclusions: Computer recording of standard tests for assessing neglect ide
ntifies novel impairments with regard to the process of carrying out tasks.
These impairments may be used to investigate changes in neglect with time,
the response of neglect to treatment and to explore further the neuropsych
ological changes associated with neglect in stroke patients.