A comparison of daclizumab to ATGAM induction in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients on triple maintenance immunosuppression

Citation
Sb. Rasaiah et al., A comparison of daclizumab to ATGAM induction in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients on triple maintenance immunosuppression, CLIN TRANSP, 14(4), 2000, pp. 409-412
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
09020063 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Part
2
Pages
409 - 412
Database
ISI
SICI code
0902-0063(200008)14:4<409:ACODTA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Daclizumab (DAC) is a molecularly engineered humanized IgGa monoclonal Ab d irected against the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL2R). Inhib iting the amplification of the immune response by blocking IL2R can reduce the frequency of acute rejection without the attendant risk of infection. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare DAC to antithymocyte (ATGAM) induction in 24 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants per formed between September 1995 and September 1998. The primary endpoints wer e the incidence within 6 months posttransplant of: 1) biopsy-proven acute r ejection; and 2) infection. The two groups (DAC, n = 12; ATGAM, n = 12) wer e matched on age, race, ESRD, number of HLA mismatches, PRA level, and cold ischemia time. DAC (1 mg/kg) was given on the day of transplant, then ever y other week (a total of five doses); ATGAM (15 mg/kg) was given on post-tr ansplant day 1, then daily for 7-10 d. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporine (Neoral(R) - 8-10 mg/kg/d) or Prograf(R) (0.16-0.2 mg/kg/d) , mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept(R) - 2-3 g/d) and steroids. Of the 12 DAC patients, 3 patients (25%) had biopsy-proven acute rejection versus 8/12 (67%) of the ATGAM patients. The time to acute rejection was si gnificantly different by group (DAC = 110 d; ATGAM = 26 d). There was a red uction in the number of patients receiving antilymphocyte drugs for moderat e to severe rejection (DAC = 2/12; ATGAM = 4/12), with 2 of the 4 ATGAM pat ients experiencing more than two episodes of biopsy-proven rejection. There was an increase in infection by group (DAC = 4/12; ATGAM = 7/12): total of three septic infections occurred in the ATGAM group opposed to none in the DAC group. Patient, pancreas, kidney 6-month survival rates were 100% for both groups. We conclude that DAC induction coupled with triple immunosuppressive therap y reduces the incidence of rejection in SPK transplant patients. The time t o acute rejection was prolonged in the DAC group compared with the ATGAM gr oup without the attendant risks of rejection.