Mycophenolate mofetil, with cyclosporine and prednisone, reduces early rejection while allowing the use of less antilymphocytic agent induction and cyclosporine in renal recipients with delayed graft function

Citation
An. Arnold et al., Mycophenolate mofetil, with cyclosporine and prednisone, reduces early rejection while allowing the use of less antilymphocytic agent induction and cyclosporine in renal recipients with delayed graft function, CLIN TRANSP, 14(4), 2000, pp. 421-426
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
09020063 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Part
2
Pages
421 - 426
Database
ISI
SICI code
0902-0063(200008)14:4<421:MMWCAP>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Antilymphocytic agent induction (ALAI), with antithymocyte globulin or mono clonal antibody, is generally used in renal transplantation (TX) to spare r enal allografts with poor initial function from the toxic effects of cyclos porine (CsA) and/or to augment immunosuppression (IS) in the patient at a h igh risk for early rejection. ALAI, unfortunately, increases the cost of TX and the risk to the patient, having been associated with many adverse side effects. An IS protocol, which results in a low incidence of early rejecti on while using less CsA and ALAI, is a worthwhile goal. We compare our experience with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), CsA, and predni sone (MMFCP; n = 62) to our azathioprine (AZA), CsA, and prednisone (AZACP; n = 50) triple-drug IS, with and without ALAI. The patient characteristics for age, race, first TX, cadaveric donor, pediatric recipient, and dialysi s in the first post-op week (DGF) were not different for the MMFCP versus A ZACP groups. There were more females in the MMFCP group (51.6% versus 30.0% , p = 0.022). We report that rejection-free survival at 6 months (RF6) was better in the MMFCP versus AZACP group (83.9% versus 60.0%, p = 0.005). Les s ALAI and CsA were used in the MMFCP patients. At I year, actuarial graft survival was 91.9% in the MMFCP group and 81.9% in the AZACP group (p = 0.1 16). Actuarial 1-year patient survivals were not different in the two patie nt groups. In the sub-population of patients with DGF, the RF6 in the MMFCP (n = 13) group was 92.3% versus 57.1% in the AZACP (n = 14) group (p = 0.0 41). The reduction in early rejection episodes in the patients on MMFCP wit h DGF was accomplished while using half as much ALAI and lower CsA doses an d levels. The African-American recipient sub-population on MMFCP also demon strated an improvement in RF6 while using less ALAI and CsA (78.6% versus 4 8.0%, p = 0.022). We conclude that the use of MMF-based triple-drug IS results in fewer rejec tion episodes while allowing for lower CsA levels and less ALAI, even in pa tients with delayed graft function.