D. Kemmerer et D. Tranel, A double dissociation between linguistic and perceptual representations ofspatial relationships, COGN NEUROP, 17(5), 2000, pp. 393-414
This paper explores from a neuropsychological perspective the relation betw
een the meanings of English locative prepositions (e.g., in, on, above, bel
ow) and the kinds of representations that are used for many visuospatial pr
ocesses such as recognising, drawing, and constructing spatially complex ob
jects. One possibility that has been proposed by some psycholinguists is th
at the meanings of prepositions are the same as the representations used in
these other processes. An alternative possibility, which has been proposed
by a different group of researchers, is that the relation is more distant
such that the meanings of prepositions constitute language-specific semanti
c structures that are distinct from the representations that underlie many
visuospatial abilities.
Here we report a detailed assessment of the linguistic as well as perceptua
l and cognitive representations of spatial relationships in two brain-damag
ed subjects. Four tests were administered that involve both the production
and comprehension of English locative prepositions. In addition, four stand
ardised neuropsychological tests that probe high-level nonlinguistic visuos
patial perception and cognition were administered. Case I was significantly
impaired on all of the preposition tests but was normal on all of the visu
ospatial tests. In striking contrast, Case 2 was normal on all of the prepo
sition tests but was significantly impaired on all of the visuospatial test
s. The subjects also had entirely different brain lesions: Case 1 had a lef
t-hemisphere lesion in the frontoparietal region, and Case 2 had a right-he
misphere lesion in the frontoparietal and temporal regions. Together, the r
esults constitute a "double dissociation, suggesting that the preposition t
ests and the visuospatial tests require cognitively and neurally distinct m
echanisms that can be disrupted independently of each other. We interpret t
he data as supporting the second possibility described - namely, that the m
eanings of locative prepositions may be language-specific semantic structur
es that are separate from the mental representations underlying many other
kinds of high-level nonlinguistic visuospatial abilities.