In this rejoinder we clarify several issues raised by the commentators with
the hope of resolving some disagreements. In particular, we address the di
stinction between information-based and experience-based metacognitive judg
ments and the idea that memory monitoring may he mediated by direct access
to internal representations. We then examine the possibility of unconscious
metacognitive processes and expand on the critical role that conscious met
acognitive feelings play in mediating between unconscious activations and e
xplicit-controlled action. Finally, several open questions are articulated
for further scrutiny. (C) 2000 Academic Press.