The aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between
interfacial forces, duration of instrumentation and effectiveness of root c
anal shaping by filing. All factors were standardised except the manner of
manipulation of the files and the dependent variables (interfacial force an
d duration of filing). The outcome measured was the final prepared canal sh
ape. The study tested the hypothesis that if interfacial forces and duratio
n of filing had predictive value for effective canal shaping, a relationshi
p between them should be apparent. If it was not, it could be inferred that
the remaining uncontrollable variable, "manner of file manipulation" had a
dominating influence. 18 operators used a standard filing technique to ins
trument a root canal each in single rooted teeth matched for anatomy. The t
eeth were mounted in a custom-made transducer designed to measure laterally
applied interfacial forces between file and dentine. The length of time ta
ken with each instrument in the series was measured giving a total duration
of instrumentation. The final canal shape measured by standardised "before
" and "after" radiographic images of the roots was judged against an "ideal
" canal shape calculated from the size of instruments used and based on the
preliminary canal shape. Although some trends were revealed, no obvious re
lationship was demonstrated between interfacial force, duration of filing a
nd final canal shape. Operators clearly used a range of interfacial forces
characteristic for each individual and for the different file sizes. Both l
ight and heavy forces could produce a satisfactory canal shape. Use of ligh
t or heavy forces did not obviously affect speed of preparation. Tactile di
scrimination was not dependent on use of light or heavy forces. It was infe
rred that the "manner of file manipulation" remained undefined and was prob
ably the dominant factor influencing outcome of canal shaping.