In a recent contribution to this journal, Jim Cheney argues for a postmoder
n epistemological framework that supports a conception of inquiry as a kind
of "conversation" with nature. I examine how Cheney arrives at this metaph
or and consider why it might be an appealing one for environmental philosop
hers. I note how, in the absence of an animistic account of nature, this me
taphor turn; our to be problematic. A closer examination of the postmodern
insights that Cheney employs reveals that it is possible to stress the agen
cy of nature in epistemology without having to draw on the metaphor of conv
ersation. I conclude that this alternative account is not only more plausib
le, but can probably do the same ethical work as the problematic metaphor o
f inquiry as conversation.