Js. Lindholt et al., Psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and conservative treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms, EUR J VAS E, 20(1), 2000, pp. 79-83
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Objective: to describe the potential psychological consequence of screening
for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).
Methods: the participants were prospectively and randomly sampled form a ra
ndomised screening trial for AAA and asked to complete a validated generic
and global anonymous quality of life (QL) questionnaire by self-assessment
(ScreenQL).
Material: case-control study: ScreenQL was completed once by 168 (48%) of 3
50 non-responders to screening, 271 (81%) of 335 attenders before screening
, 286 (85%) of 335 attenders after screening, 127 (85%) of 149 with a small
AAA diagnosed at screening, and 231 (66%) of 350 who were randomised not b
e offered screening for AAA (controls). Prospective study (paired data): 12
7 men having a small AAA diagnosed. Twenty-nine (81%) of 36 men operated af
ter initial conservative treatment.
Results: initially, the QL score was 5% lower among men with a small AAA co
mpared to the controls (p<0.05), mainly because of poorer health perception
. The QL score declined significantly further to 7% below control values du
ring the period of conservative treatment. This impairment was mainly due t
o a 21% and 15% reduction in score relating to health perception and psycho
somatic distress, respectively. However, all scores improved to control lev
els in patients operated on. The QL of attending men for screening was sign
ificantly lower than that of the controls and the attenders after the scree
ning. no differences were noticed concerning the non-attenders.
Conclusion: the offer of screening causes transient psychological stress in
subjects found not to have AAA. However, diagnosis of an AAA seems to impa
ir QL permanently and progressively in conservatively treated cases. This i
mpairment seems reversible by operation. Nevertheless, the impairment seems
considerable,a nd must be considered in the management of AAA and in the f
inal evaluation of screening for AAA.