One useful source of depth information available to the human nervous syste
m is present in the horizontal disparities that exist between the two retin
al images (stereoscopic depth). The relationship between horizontal dispari
ty and depth varies with viewing distance so that an interpreting signal is
required if disparities are to yield useful information. One potentially u
seful interpreting signal is available from ocular vergence. A number of st
udies have concluded. however, that a vergence signal does not provide veri
dical stereoscopic depth, All of these studies required observers to make a
range of judgements under conditions of uncertainty (often using random do
t stimuli) and we suggest that the lack of veridicality arose because of a
contraction bias: a general tendency to bias judgements towards the centre
of the range of possible responses. We re-examined the role of ocular verge
nce in the maintenance of stereoscopic depth constancy for teal three-dimen
sional objects. Our results question the conclusions reached by previous st
udies and suggest that vergence can provide a veridical interpretation of s
tereoscopic depth. Our results indicate that horizontal retinal image dispa
rities are not interpreted by a 'higher order' signal (i.e. the 'perceived
distance' of the fixation point). The results of the experiment have signif
icant implications for models of depth processing from disparity.