British general practitioners' attitudes toward abortion

Citation
C. Francome et E. Freeman, British general practitioners' attitudes toward abortion, FAM PLAN PE, 32(4), 2000, pp. 189-191
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES
ISSN journal
00147354 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
189 - 191
Database
ISI
SICI code
0014-7354(200007/08)32:4<189:BGPATA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Context: Women in Great Britain may obtain abortions only if they meet cert ain criteria and the procedure is approved by two physicians. Since seeing a general practitioner is typically a woman's first step toward obtaining a n abortion, these doctors' attitudes about the procedure are very important Methods: In 1999, a random sample of 702 general practitioners participated in a mailed survey regarding their attitudes toward abortion and the Briti sh Abortion Act. Results: Four in five respondents considered themselves broadly prochoice, and three in five believed that the current law should be liberalized to gi ve women the right to obtain an abortion without regard as to reason. Three -quarters of doctors favored government provision of free abortions, and on e-quarter thought that the current law places an unreasonable burden on gen eral practitioners. However, physicians' opinions about whether the abortio n decision should be the woman's alone depended on the pregnancy's gestatio n, and three-fifths of respondents said that the law was appropriate. Among doctors who were broadly antiabortion, one-fifth favored women's right to choose, and two-thirds supported the current law; however, nearly half oppo sed government funding of abortion services, and one-quarter did not feel t hat physicians need to reveal their antiabortion stance to patients. Conclusions: Although Great Britain's abortion law is more restrictive than those in many other developed countries, general practitioners have largel y positive attitudes toward women's access to abortion and toward the exist ing law. Their occasionally contradictory views, however, suggest that some areas are potentially problematic.