R. Billington et N. Carmichael, Setting of acute reference doses for pesticides based on existing regulatory requirements and regulatory test guidelines, FOOD ADDIT, 17(7), 2000, pp. 621-626
Reference doses (RfD) for the definition of tolerable food residues have tr
aditionally been based on the lowest no observed adverse effect level (NOAE
L), which usually comes from chronic toxicity studies. While this is genera
lly agreed to be a safe approach to evaluate the overall significance of ex
pected consumption it is clear that it is not appropriate for evaluation of
the toxicological significance of residues in a single meal. Standard acut
e toxicity tests are not designed to generate an NOAEL, from which an RfD c
an be derived. They are more appropriate to evaluating risk following accid
ental high exposure to the product itself rather than to food residues. A t
ypical toxicological database for a pesticide active substance contains stu
dies which may be appropriate, on a case-by- case basis, to evaluate shorte
r term endpoints of interest for specific molecules, such as developmental
or acute neurotoxicity studies. However, their specificity limits their sco
pe of application. General toxicological endpoints are well covered by shor
t-term, 28- or 90-day, guideline studies. However, neither of these studies
is ideal for setting of an acute RfD (ARfD) as the treatment period is sig
nificantly longer than the duration of consumer exposure. This could be bal
anced by applying a reduced safety factor to the NOAEL to set the ARfD. Alt
ernatively, a test guideline could be designed to generate a relevant acute
NOAEL but the time necessary for development, validation and acceptance of
such a guideline means that an interim approach is, in any case, necessary
.