Ph. Lahteenmaki et al., State of the art in childhood cancer care: Perceived attitudes of Finnish patients and parents on disease and treatment-related issues, INT J PED H, 6(6), 2000, pp. 429-439
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY
Purpose During the past ten years in Finland as well as internationally, nu
merous improvements have been made in the care of childhood cancer patients
. To find out possible need for further interventions in modern childhood c
ancer care, the ratings of patients and their parents on disease-related me
dical and non-medical issues were studied.
Patients and Methods In a cross-sectional setting, queries were performed f
rom 3 to 48 months after diagnosis, and a questionnaire with visual analogu
e scales was used. There were 99 families responding, which was about 67% o
f all eligible families. A background variable analysis and analysis of obs
erver agreement of categorical assessments were performed.
Results and Conclusions The results indicated that, despite some critical v
oluntary comments, both patients and parents were satisfied with informatio
n given, with possibilities to contribute to the child's care, and with con
tinuity in patient-staff relations. However, there seemed to be a desire fo
r more systematic psychological support for patients and families, and the
school-aged patients wanted to contribute more in medical decision making.
The changes in appearances of the school-aged patients, as well as nausea a
nd isolation, were the most unpleasant factors for the patients and interve
ntions to further alleviate these inconveniences should be planned. Parenta
l information on the late-effects of cancer treatment seemed to be needed m
ost about 7-12 months after diagnosis, which might be a good timing for par
ent/family courses. The school-aged patients were not concerned about late
consequences of treatment and this aspect might further stress the need for
systematic, person and prevention oriented follow-up. Our results could be
taken as a guideline for further interventions and renovations in the fiel
d of quality of childhood cancer care. The methods used in this study seeme
d to be valid in studying the state of the art in childhood cancer care and
, thus, they also could be applicable internationally.