The author suggests that change inevitably creates anxiety because of loss
and confrontation with the unknown. It is proposed that one function of sym
bols is to manage the anxiety of change. They no this by creating a means b
y which anxieties can be presented to the subject and then communicated to
another mind. These creations are called symbolic because, it is proposed,
their purpose is the communication as well as the incorporation of internal
anxieties and desires with external exigencies, which might be termed symp
toms. Viewing them in this way enables the analyst to put symbolic phenomen
a as they emerge in an analysis into an intersubjective perspective. The au
thor suggests that thinking of symbols as purely intrasubjective phenomena
limits our perspective. It is more technically useful to look at the commun
icative aspects of symbols as they present themselves to the symbolising su
bject; and, subsequently,, to the analyst in the dialogue within the psycho
analytic setting because the objective and temporal dimension of the settin
g can thereby be included Two clinical examples of symbols are discussed, o
ne that was brought for analysis and a second that developed in the course
of an analysis. One is given as an example of resistance to change, whereas
the other revealed an unconscious drive for change.