Describing and predicting the nature of procedural pain after thermal injuries: Implications for research

Citation
Jt. Ptacek et al., Describing and predicting the nature of procedural pain after thermal injuries: Implications for research, J BURN CARE, 21(4), 2000, pp. 318-326
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
02738481 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
318 - 326
Database
ISI
SICI code
0273-8481(200007/08)21:4<318:DAPTNO>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
A prerequisite for studying and treating burn-related pain is the establish ment of a good understanding of the nature of burn-related pain. However, i n most investigations of pain, researchers have failed to examine pain over time or to create summary scores that capture differences in the nature of the pain experiences of individual patients. For 10 consecutive days, 47 p atients treated for burn injuries reported on three aspects of procedural p ain: worst pain, sensory pain, and affective pain. Three summary pain score s were constructed for each pain dimension: average pain, variability in pa in, and linear change in pain. The authors found considerable variability i n pain reports from the same patient and from different patients. Analyses indicated that pain reports decreased over time and that patients who had m ore trait anxiety reported more pain. Patients with larger burn injuries te nded to report more affective pain and tended to have a pattern of high and low pain reports that differed from patients with less severe burn injurie s. These findings suggest that adequate assessment of burn pain must occur frequently over the course of a single day, as well as for the duration of each patient's care.