Enhancement of platelet recovery after myelosuppressive chemotherapy by recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor in patients with advanced cancer

Citation
Rl. Basser et al., Enhancement of platelet recovery after myelosuppressive chemotherapy by recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor in patients with advanced cancer, J CL ONCOL, 18(15), 2000, pp. 2852-2861
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
0732183X → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
15
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2852 - 2861
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-183X(200008)18:15<2852:EOPRAM>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the influence of dose and schedule on the ability of pe gylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG- rHuMGDF) to abrogate thrombocytopenia after multiple cycles of chemotherapy and to mobilize peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Patients and Methods: In this open-label study, 68 patients with advanced c ancer were randomized to receive PEG-rHuMGDF subcutaneously at different do ses and durations before administration of carboplatin 600 mg/m(2), cycloph osphamide 1,200 mg/m(2), and filgrastim 5 mu g/kg/d. PEG-rHuMGDF was not gi ven after the first cycle of chemotherapy but was given after the second an d subsequent cycles. Chemotherapy was given every 28 days for up to six cyc les. Results: In patients who received the same dose of chemotherapy for at leas t two cycles, the platelet nadir war significantly higher (47.5 x 10(9)/L v 35.5 x 10(9)/L; P = .003) and duration of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia si gnificantly shorter (0 v 3 days; P = .004) when PEG-rHuMGDF was administere d after chemotherapy. There was no evidence of an effect of PEG-rHuMGDF whe n it was given before chemotherapy. Platelet recovery after the first cycle of chemotherapy was no different for different PEG-rHuMGDF regimens, and t here was no difference between patients treated with PEG-rHuMGDF and histor ical controls treated with identical chemotherapy. There was a modest dose- related increase in progenitor cell levels after administration of PEG-rHuM GDF alone. peak levels of PBPC occurred later in cycle 2 than in cycle 1 bu t were not different in magnitude. Conclusion: PEG-rHuMGDF abrogated severe thrombocytopenia after dose-intens ive chemotherapy. However, it had only a modest effect on progenitor cell l evels and did not enhance progenitor cell mobilization after chemotherapy a nd filgrastim. J Clin Oncol 18:2852-2861. (C) 2000 by American Society of C linical Oncology.