A comparative trial of imipenem versus ceftazidime in the release of endotoxin and cytokine generation in patients with Gram-negative urosepsis

Citation
M. Luchi et al., A comparative trial of imipenem versus ceftazidime in the release of endotoxin and cytokine generation in patients with Gram-negative urosepsis, J ENDOTOX R, 6(1), 2000, pp. 25-31
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ENDOTOXIN RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09680519 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
25 - 31
Database
ISI
SICI code
0968-0519(2000)6:1<25:ACTOIV>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Evidence from ill vitro experiments and animal and human studies indicate t hat antibiotic therapy may induce the release of endotoxin from the outer m embrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Antibiotics that bind preferentially to penicillin-binding protein-2 (PBP-2) -such as imipenem - are associated wit h little release of endotoxin, while antibiotics that preferentially bind t o PBP-3 - such as ceftazidime - are associated with far greater release of endotoxin. We conducted a randomized, multicenter, double-blind study compa ring imipenem to ceftazidime in patients with urinary tract infections caus ed by Gram-negative bacilli associated with signs and symptoms of systemic inflammation. A total of 33 patients were randomized to receive either imip enem (n = 14) or ceftazidime (n = 19) for initial treatment for urosepsis. No differences in plasma endotoxin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis fa ctor-alpha (TNF-alpha) or urine endotoxin, IL-6 or IL-8 levels were found b etween the two treatment groups within the first 8 h after antibiotic admin istration. We conclude that, if differences exist with respect to endotoxin release by these two antimicrobial agents, these differences an not readil y demonstrable in this clinical study with carefully defined patients with Gram-negative urinary tract infections.