Researchers frequently use data from monitoring tasks to argue that constra
ints on meaning facilitate lower-level processes. An alternative hypothesis
is that the processing level that a monitoring task requires interacts wit
h discourse-level processing. Subjects monitored spoken sentences for a syn
onym (semantic match), a nonsense word (phonological match), or a rhyme (ph
onologically and semantically constrained matching). The critical targets a
ppeared at the beginning of the final clause in two-clause sentences that b
egan with if, which signals a semantic analysis at the discourse level, or
with though, which maintains a surface representation. Synonym-monitoring t
imes were faster for if than for though, nonsense word-monitoring times wer
e faster than for if, and rhyme-monitoring times did not differ for if and
though. The results show that conjunctions influence how listeners allocate
attention to semantic versus phonological information, implying that liste
ners form these kinds of information independently.