Estimation of on-site cost of soil erosion: A comparison of replacement and productivity change methods

Citation
Hm. Gunatilake et Gr. Vieth, Estimation of on-site cost of soil erosion: A comparison of replacement and productivity change methods, J SOIL WAT, 55(2), 2000, pp. 197-204
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
ISSN journal
00224561 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
197 - 204
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4561(2000)55:2<197:EOOCOS>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Solutions to soil erosion problems in developing countries are constrained by tack of reliable data for formulating sound soil conservation policies. Given the budget constraints faced by these countries, use of expensive met hods to generate data is not practical. Therefore, it is important to searc h for low cost and less time consuming methods to generate economic informa tion of soil erosion. This research examines the reliability of less expens ive replacement cost methods. Replacement cost and productivity change meth ods are applied to estimate the onsite cost of soil erosion in the zipper M ahaweli watershed of Sri Lanka. Results show that on the average, replaceme nt cost method provide about 29% higher estimates for on-site cost. When th e two sets of on-site cost estimates are used in benefit cost analysis for practicing soil conservation, they provide identical decision guidelines. H owever, the two methods provide different results in choosing the best soil conservation measure. Further empirical investigations on reliability of t he replacement cost method are encouraged.