St. Ball et al., Injuries of the thoracolumbar spine associated with restraint use in head-on motor vehicle accidents, J SPINAL D, 13(4), 2000, pp. 297-304
Many authors have described spinal and bodily injuries associated with seat
belt use. However, most reports have focused primarily on lap seat belts a
nd resultant flexion-distraction injuries. This retrospective chart review
studies the relation between the specific type of restraint or air bag and
the resultant thoracolumbar spinal injury subtype and associated bodily inj
uries. The charts of 221 patients who had sustained thoracolumbar fractures
in motor vehicle accidents during a 10-year period were reviewed, and 37 p
atients were identified whose accidents were clearly described as a frontal
collision and whose specific form of restraint was recorded. Among the 15
patients who used a shoulder strap and lap belt device (three-point restrai
nt), 12 patients sustained burst fractures (80%) compared with 4 of the 14
patients (28.6%) restrained with lap seat belts alone. Life-threatening int
raabdominal injuries occurred in 57.1% of lap-belted victims and in 26.7% o
f patients who used three-point restraints, and the character of these inju
ries also differed. No patients in an automobile in which an air bag deploy
ed sustained major associated bodily injuries. Among restrained occupants o
f head-on motor vehicle accidents who have sustained a thoracolumbar fractu
re, patients using lap belts are more Likely to sustain the classic flexion
-distraction injury patterns, whereas patients using three-point restraints
may sustain a higher incidence of burst fractures. In addition, three-poin
t restraints are associated with a decreased risk of intraabdominal injury
compared with lap seat belts.