Dy. Kim et al., Significance of serum and tissue carcinoembryonic antigen for the prognosis of gastric carcinoma patients, J SURG ONC, 74(3), 2000, pp. 185-192
Background and Objectives: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been widely a
ccepted as a tumor marker useful in the diagnosis and management of colorec
tal carcinoma. When CEA levels are positive in patients with gastric carcin
oma, they could be useful prognostic indicators. The value of CEA as a tumo
r marker for gastric carcinoma, however, remains a matter of controversy. T
he purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative serum CEA va
lue and tissue CEA staining are useful prognostic indicators for gastric ca
rcinoma.
Methods: We measured preoperative serum CEA levels by radioimmunoassay and
stained tissue CEA production by tumor cells from gastric carcinomas using
immunohistochemical staining in patients with gastric carcinoma.
Results: The patients with preoperative serum CEA levels >10.0 ng/mL had a
more prominent serosal invasion, much more lymph node involvement, more adv
anced stage and more poorly differentiated than did the patients with preop
erative serum CEA levels <5.0 ng/mL. The survival rate of patients with ser
um CEA levels >10.0 ng/mL was poorer than those of patients with serum CEA
levels between 5.0 and 10.0 ng/mL, and those of patients with serum CEA lev
els <5.0 ng/mL (P < 0.05). The preoperative serum CEA levels and tumor CEA-
positivity were correlated (P < 0.05). In patients with lymph node metastas
es, the CEA-positivity (78.0%) was higher than in patients without lymph no
de metastasis (63.2%) (P < 0.05). A correlation was also found between the
depth of tumor invasion and tissue CEA-positivity (P < 0.001). The postoper
ative survival rate was significantly better in the CEA-negative staining g
roup (78.0%) than in the CEA-positive staining group (60.0%).
Conclusions: These data suggest that preoperative serum CEA levels and stai
ning for CEA in gastric carcinoma tissue sections may have a predictive val
ue in determining prognostic information for patients with resectable gastr
ic carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2000;74:185-192. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.