Background. Identification of high-risk residents allows remediation and su
pport for administrative action when necessary. This study characterizes di
fferences in documentation of marginally performing residents in a general
surgery residency.
Methods. High-risk residents were identified by the former program director
. Twenty-four of one hundred fifteen residents over a 10-year period had on
e to four problematic areas: cognitive, synthetic, family/health, and inter
personal skills. Outcomes included finished (18), voluntary withdrawal (1),
and involuntary withdrawal (5), A case-control study matching controls to
cases by date of entry into the training program was used, Records were rev
iewed for demographics, preentry qualifications, American Board of Surgery
In-Training Exam (ABSITE) scores, letters of complaint or praise, events of
counseling, and monthly ratings. The records of 48 residents were reviewed
. Ward evaluations were on eight categories with a 5-point Leikert scale (3
-unacceptable to 7-outstanding). The evaluation score assigns points only t
o low ratings. High scores represent progressively poorer performance. A Wi
lcoxon signed ranks test was used to compare the cases and controls for con
tinuous variables. The McNemar test was used in comparisons of categorical
data with binary outcomes. Exact P values are reported.
Results. Objective data were similar for both groups. Study residents tende
d to score higher on monthly evaluations at Year 2 and by Year 3 this achie
ved significance (0.026). Study residents were more likely to have negative
faculty letters (0.016) and events of counseling by a faculty member (0.01
7) and the program director (0.005).
Conclusions. Identification of residents at risk should begin as early as p
ossible during training. A combination of faculty evaluations and evidence
of letters of counseling can detect high-risk residents. Programs may use s
uch indicators to support decisions regarding remedial work or administrati
ve action. (C) 2000 Academic Press.