Objective: To evaluate the reliability of using certain indicators derived
from human figure drawings to distinguish between suicidal and nonsuicidal
adolescents. Method: Ninety consecutive admissions to an adolescent inpatie
nt unit were assessed. Thirty-nine patients were admitted because of suicid
al behavior and 51 for other reasons. All subjects were given the Human Fig
ure Drawing (HFD) test. HFD was evaluated according to the method of Pfeffe
r and Richman, and the degree of suicidal behavior was rated by the Child S
uicide Potential Scale. Results: The internal reliability was satisfactory
HFD indicators correlated significantly with quantitative measures of suici
dal behavior; of these indictors specifically, overall impression of the ev
aluator enabled the prediction of suicidal behavior and the distinction bet
ween suicidal and nonsuicidal inpatients (p < .001). A group of graphic ind
icators derived from a discriminant analysis formed a function, which was a
ble to identify 84.6% of the suicidal and 76.6% of the nonsuicidal adolesce
nts correctly. Many of the items had a regressive quality. Conclusions: The
HFD is an example of a simple projective test that may have empirical reli
ability. It may be useful for the assessment of severe suicidal behavior in
adolescents.