The authors have collected fecal and gastric samples from 110 pigs originat
ing from 27 farms and a further 116 fecal samples from six additional farms
. Fifty-eight pigs were selected randomly, whereas 52 pigs were chosen on t
he basis of the presence of gross lesions (catarrh, parakeratosis, ulcer).
Samples for histological examination were collected from the oesophageal, c
ardiac, fundic and pyloric regions. The paraffin-embedded samples were sect
ioned and stained with hemalaun-eosin and subsequently examined for the pre
sence of inflammation. parakeratosis or ulceration. Some sections were also
stained with the Warthin-Starry method and there were structures similar t
o Helicobacter suis found on the mucosal surface and in the foveolae (Figur
e 3. and 4.). Of the 110 stomachs examined, 67 had gross lesions. Of the 82
stomach samples examined histologically, all sections showed some form of
mucosal lesion [inflammation (Figure 1.), parakeratosis, ulcer (Figure 2.)]
. The HpSA-ELISA-test, capable of detecting the somatic antigen of H. pylor
i even from disintegrated bacteria, was positive in all cases tested (Table
1.). This is likely to be due to the presence of bacteria that are antigen
ically related to N. pylori, or other, as yet unidentified Helicobacter spe
cies. Further histological studies are necessary to clarify the pathologica
l significance of Helicobacter infection in swine.