FLICA-4: a three-dimensional two-phase flow computer code with advanced numerical methods for nuclear applications

Citation
I. Toumi et al., FLICA-4: a three-dimensional two-phase flow computer code with advanced numerical methods for nuclear applications, NUCL ENG DE, 200(1-2), 2000, pp. 139-155
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Nuclear Emgineering
Journal title
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
ISSN journal
00295493 → ACNP
Volume
200
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
139 - 155
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-5493(200008)200:1-2<139:FATTFC>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
This paper is devoted to new numerical methods developed for three-dimensio nal two-phase flow calculations. These methods are finite volume numerical methods. They are based on an extension of Roe's approximate Riemann solver to define convective fluxes Versus mean cell quantities [Godunov, S.K., 19 59, Math. Sb. 47, 217; Roe, P.L., 1981, Approximate Riemanns solvers parame ter vectors and difference scheme. J. Comp. Phys. 43, 357-372; Toumi, I., 1 992, A weak formulation of Roe's approximate Riemann solver. J. Comp. Phys. 102, 360-373]. To go forward in time, a linearized conservative implicit i ntegrating step is used [Yee, H.C., 1987. NASA TM-89464], together with a N ewton iterative method. We also present here some improvements performed to obtain a fully implicit solution method that provides fast running steady state calculations. This kind of numerical method, which is used widely for fluid dynamic calculations, has proved to be very efficient for the numeri cal solution to two-phase flow problems. This numerical method has been imp lemented for the three-dimensional thermal-hydraulic code FLICA-4 that is m ainly dedicated to core thermal-hydraulic transient and steady-state analys is [Toumi, I., Caruge, D., 1998. An implicit second order method for 3D two phase flow calculations. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 130, 213-225; Raymond, P., Toumi, I., 1992. Numerical method for three-dimensional steady-state two-phase fl ow calculation, NURETH-5, Salt Lake City]. Hereafter, elements of physical validation against hydraulic and two-phase flow rod bundle experiments are presented. We will also find some results obtained for the EPR reactor runn ing in a steady-state at 60% of nominal power with three pumps out of four, and a thermal-hydraulic core analysis for a 1300 MW PWR at low flow Steam- Line-Break conditions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.