Objective: To estimate the incidence of complications of diagnostic and ope
rative hysteroscopic procedures in the Netherlands and describe their natur
e.
Methods: Data on complications were recorded by 82 hospitals in 1997. Parti
cipating hospitals had a 100% response rate. Any unexpected events that req
uired intraoperative or postoperative intervention were defined as complica
tions in two groups: approach (entry-related) and technique-related (caused
by surgical instruments).
Results: Thirty-eight complications occurred among 13,600 hysteroscopic pro
cedures (rate 0.28%). Diagnostic hysteroscopic procedures had a significant
ly lower complication rate (0.13%) than operative procedures (rate 0.95%; P
< .01). Fluid overloads of distention medium were recorded five times (rat
e 0.20%). The most frequent surgical complication was perforation of the ut
erine cavity (rate 0.76%). Approximately half the perforations (18 of 33) w
ere entry-related. Bleeding caused by perforation was seen in 0.16% of case
s. Incidences of complications were: intrauterine adhesiolysis 4.48%, endom
etrium resection 0.81%, myomectomy 0.75%, and removal of a polyp 0.38%.
Conclusion: Diagnostic hysteroscopic procedures had very low complication r
ates, so are safe procedures with which to evaluate intrauterine pathology.
Operative hysteroscopic procedures were more risky, but the removal of pol
yps had a very low complication rate (12 times lower than synechiolysis). H
alf the complications were entry-related, so attention has to be paid to th
e method of entry with the hysteroscope (ie, no unnecessary dilation of cer
vix and introduction of the scope under direct vision). The other half of c
omplications were related to surgeons' experience and type of procedure. ((
C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).