The role of visual feedback in manual tracking was investigated in 24 subje
cts who tracked 5-, 10-, and 40-mm/diameter targets, moving on a screen at
18 to 25 mm/sec., along various paths, by moving an unseen handle over a di
gitizing tablet. A cursor indicating instantaneous handle position was visi
ble at all times on half the trials and hidden within a circle coaxial with
the target but double its diameter in the other half. The handle had to be
within the instantaneous target's digitizer-defined boundaries for the lat
ter to keep moving. All tracking movements were segmented into small moveme
nt steps. A tendency to outrun the target was seen, indicating predictive c
ontrol. Absence of visual feedback had negligible effect on movement veloci
ty. Movement direction appeared to involve open-loop programming but improv
ed significantly when subjects could see the cursor. Occasional corrective
movements occurred only when visual feedback was given. Otherwise, a large
positional error accumulates despite reasonable ability to control tracking
direction.