Piezoelectric ESWL of ureteric stones. Influence of the site and dimensions of the stones on treatment modalities and performances.

Citation
M. Robert et al., Piezoelectric ESWL of ureteric stones. Influence of the site and dimensions of the stones on treatment modalities and performances., PROG UROL, 10(3), 2000, pp. 397-403
Citations number
61
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE
ISSN journal
11667087 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
397 - 403
Database
ISI
SICI code
1166-7087(200006)10:3<397:PEOUSI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of the site and dimensions of ureteric stones on the modalities and performances of in situ piezoelectric extraco rporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). Material and Methods: A population of 385 patients with solitary radiopaque ureteric stones was analysed. The long axis of these stones (211 (55%) lum bar 38 (10%) iliac and 136 (35%) pelvic stones) ranged from 5 to 21 mm (mea n = 8.2 mm). The initial shock wave frequency was 4/s. Lumbar stones were t reated in the dorsal supine position under diazanalgesia and pelvic stones were treated in the ventral supine position without systematic sedation. Th e influence of wave frequency (1 versus 4/s) on the level of sedation and t herapeutic performances was studied on 146 patients with lumbar (n=92) or p elvic stones (n=54), The results were evaluated after only one ESWL session and were analysed statistically by Student's test and Fisher test. Results: The overall complete success rate was 74%, Iliac stones were chara cterized by significantly (p<0.05) lower (61%) performances. The results we re inversely proportional to the size of the stones, as the complete succes s rate was only 25% for stones >12 mm. For lumbar stones, a lower frequency allowed a very significant reduction (p<0.0001) of the level of sedation r equired without affecting the performance. For pelvic stones, a low frequen cy significantly (p<0.05) limited the efficacy of ESWL, especially for ston es >8 mm (27% of complete successes). Conclusion: In situ piezoelectric ESWL allows effective management of most ureteric stones with of long axis between 5 and 10 mm. In the context of ou tpatient treatment, however; this approach requires modulation of the shock wave frequency according to the site of the stone. Another therapeutic app roach, particularly endoscopy, should be considered for very large stones.