PURPOSE: To assess magnetic resonance (MR) colonography as a method for det
ection of colorectal masses, with conventional colonoscopy as the reference
standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR colonography was performed in 132 patients referr
ed for colonoscopy because of the possible presence of a mass. After rectal
filling with a gadopentetate dimeglumine and water enema, T1-weighted thre
e-dimensional gradient-echo MR studies were acquired with the patient in th
e prone and supine positions. Water-sensitive single-shot fast spin-echo MR
images were also obtained. Surface-rendered virtual endoscopic endoluminal
views, orthogonal sections in three planes, and water-sensitive MR images
were interactively assessed for presence of colorectal masses by two radiol
ogists logists.
RESULTS: MR colonography was well tolerated without sedation or analgesia.
MR image quality was sufficient for diagnosis in 127 (96%) patients. Most s
mall (less than or equal to 5mm-diameter) masses were overlooked at MR colo
nography, but 19 of 31 6-10-mm lesions and 26 of 27 large (>10-mm) lesions
were correctly identified. For these large masses, MR colonography had a se
nsitivity of 93%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value of 92%, and
negative predictive value of 98% for detection of masses.
CONCLUSION: MR colonography is a promising modality for help in detecting c
olorectal mass lesions larger than 10 mm in diameter.