The development and testing of small concentrating PV systems

Spreadsheets have been used to compare some 90 possible small PV concentrat or designs that might be suitable for use at remote sites. They have apertu res of about 2 m(2), use BP Solar LEG cells, and employ small aperture modu les to reduce heat sinking and construction costs. Designs include fixed V- troughs and CPCs, single axis tracked cylindrical lens and mirror systems, and two-axis tracked spherical-symmetry systems. Performance and volume pro duction costs were estimated. Four promising systems were constructed as pr ototypes: (A) Point-focus Fresnel lenses, two-axis tracking; Cg = 32 X; and 69 X with secondaries. (B) Line-focus mirror parabolic troughs, one-axis tracking, Cg = 20 X. (C) SMTS ('single-mirror two-stage'), one-axis tracking, Cg = 30 X. (F) Multiple line-focus mirror parabolic troughs, E-W 1/day manual tracking , Cg = 6 X. The prototypes were tested at Reading, and three for up to a year's field t rial at ZSW's test site, Widderstall, in Germany. The best system efficienc ies, normalised to 25 degrees C and excluding the end losses of linear syst ems, were 12.5%, 13.2%, 13.6% and 14.3% for collectors A, B, C, and F, resp ectively. The collectors were practical and robust, and the performances of collectors B, C and F are only 10% below the estimates in the spreadsheet calculations. The best collectors have estimated production costs between 1 .5 and 1.8 US $/Wp, yielding energy costs at a good site (excluding BOS and overheads) of between 5 and 7 cents/kWh (18 and 25 cents/MJ). On the same cost basis a conventional PV array costs 4.3 $/Wp, and 18 cents/kWh (65 cen ts/MJ). (C) 1999 ISES. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserv ed.