The issue of coping with cultural transition, as in the case of immigr
ation, has been the focus of extensive investigation in many domains.
There is some diversity among scholars as to the relationship between
change, stress, risk and well-being. Children, in particular, are rega
rded at risk since they experience parental stress and are exposed to
two sometimes conflicting socializing systems. Consequently, parental
modes of coping with ''acculturation stress'' are considered major fac
tors in predicting immigrant children's well-being. This article chall
enges existing views of a linear relation between parental coping and
child well-being, suggesting that there is a great complexity and many
variables that affect both parental coping strategies related to immi
gration and the definition of risk. We suggest that child development
is affected by parental values and ideologies which form the ''Adaptiv
e Adult'' image of the culture in which the children are raised. Immig
rant parents confronted with a foreign Adaptive Adult image held by th
e socializing agents of the host culture may adopt one of the several
different coping styles. The article describes three most common copin
g styles labelled by metaphors from the animal world: the traditional
''uni-cultural'' style which promotes conservation is represented by t
he Kangaroo strategy; the ''culturally-disoriented'' style which calls
for rapid assimilation of children is represented by the Cuckoo metap
hor; and the ''bi-cultural'' style, based on a meditative approach, is
illustrated by the Chameleon's ability to change its colour to blend
in with the environment. Representatives of four professional sectors
who an in daily contact with immigrant families, including educators,
social workers, educational psychologist and paediatricians, were pres
ented with three typical coping strategies and were asked to express t
heir opinions regarding the adaptive and risk values of each coping st
yle. By applying a qualitative research approach, results indicate tha
t there are variations in the way the various stakeholders (parents an
d socializing agents) perceive basic concepts such as adaptation, risk
and well-being. Consequently, their evaluations of the different pare
ntal coping styles vary, suggesting that it is all ''in the mind of th
e beholder''.