Kh. Labs et al., The reliability of leg circumference assessment: a comparison of spring tape measurements and optoelectronic volumetry, VASC MED, 5(2), 2000, pp. 69-74
The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability of repeated spring
tape measurements with optoelectronic volumeter measurements for the asses
sment of lower leg circumferences. The limb circumferences at mid-calf and
ankle level of both legs were measured three times using a spring tape meas
ure as well as an optoelectronic volumeter. In all, 30 healthy volunteers p
articipated in the study. Test reliability and repeatability were described
through the process-related and between-subject variances and variance-der
ived parameters such as the reliability coefficient (intraclass correlation
coefficient, RC), the relative precision (RP), and the coefficient of repe
atability (CR). A higher value for the RC and a lower value for the RP indi
cate that the test variability is predominantly due to between-subject vari
ance and not to test process-related variance. RCs for both methods, indepe
ndent of whether measurements were taken at calf or at ankle level, always
exceeded 0.95. RPs were in the same order of magnitude for both methods but
lower for measurements at calf than at ankle level (range: RPcalf 6.36-8.7
4%; range: RPankle 12.49-18.56%). CRs for both methods were low and of comp
arable magnitude (CR range: 4.8-7.7), although slightly smaller for the spr
ing tape. When measurement results from the spring tape and the volumeter w
ere compared, results achieved with the volumeter were significantly longer
than those from the spring tape (p < 0.05). Results from both methods were
linearly in good agreement and there was no proportional bias; differences
shown were due to a significant constant bias regarding the volumeter. Cir
cumference measurements taken by spring tape and by optoelectronic volumetr
y are both characterized by a comparably high reliability. However, these m
ethods cannot be used in an interchangeable way because a constant bias exi
sts for volumetry, resulting in significantly larger circumferences compare
d with those measured using the spring tape.