The reliability of leg circumference assessment: a comparison of spring tape measurements and optoelectronic volumetry

Citation
Kh. Labs et al., The reliability of leg circumference assessment: a comparison of spring tape measurements and optoelectronic volumetry, VASC MED, 5(2), 2000, pp. 69-74
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
VASCULAR MEDICINE
ISSN journal
1358863X → ACNP
Volume
5
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
69 - 74
Database
ISI
SICI code
1358-863X(200005)5:2<69:TROLCA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability of repeated spring tape measurements with optoelectronic volumeter measurements for the asses sment of lower leg circumferences. The limb circumferences at mid-calf and ankle level of both legs were measured three times using a spring tape meas ure as well as an optoelectronic volumeter. In all, 30 healthy volunteers p articipated in the study. Test reliability and repeatability were described through the process-related and between-subject variances and variance-der ived parameters such as the reliability coefficient (intraclass correlation coefficient, RC), the relative precision (RP), and the coefficient of repe atability (CR). A higher value for the RC and a lower value for the RP indi cate that the test variability is predominantly due to between-subject vari ance and not to test process-related variance. RCs for both methods, indepe ndent of whether measurements were taken at calf or at ankle level, always exceeded 0.95. RPs were in the same order of magnitude for both methods but lower for measurements at calf than at ankle level (range: RPcalf 6.36-8.7 4%; range: RPankle 12.49-18.56%). CRs for both methods were low and of comp arable magnitude (CR range: 4.8-7.7), although slightly smaller for the spr ing tape. When measurement results from the spring tape and the volumeter w ere compared, results achieved with the volumeter were significantly longer than those from the spring tape (p < 0.05). Results from both methods were linearly in good agreement and there was no proportional bias; differences shown were due to a significant constant bias regarding the volumeter. Cir cumference measurements taken by spring tape and by optoelectronic volumetr y are both characterized by a comparably high reliability. However, these m ethods cannot be used in an interchangeable way because a constant bias exi sts for volumetry, resulting in significantly larger circumferences compare d with those measured using the spring tape.