A total of 56 natural emeralds and 26 synthetic emeralds were studied by PI
XE. From the PIXE spectra and the concentrations of 33 elements, i.e. Sc, T
i, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, K, Rb, Cs, Ca, Sr, Ba, Co, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, La, Ce, Ga,
P, S, Cl, As, Br, Mo, W, Pb, Bi, Pt, Au and Rh, obtained from the hulk ana
lyses of inclusion-free regions of the stones, criteria for differentiating
between natural and synthetic emeralds and among different localities of n
atural emeralds were deduced. The use of concentrations of only three chrom
ophoric elements, Cr, Fe and V, allowed us to attribute Pakistan emeralds,
Chatham, Gilson, Taiwan and Lennix flux emeralds and a mixed group incorpor
ating Russian flux and Russian hydrothermal emeralds. We then investigated
all 32 elements (Rh was not detected in all the samples) through principal
component analysis (PCA), which allowed us to specify whether an emerald wa
s natural or synthetic in the first place and we were then successful in at
tributing the stone, as a second step, to four localities for natural stone
s, and to eight types for synthetic stones, one of which was a mixed group.
The PCA of a reduced set of six elements, Cr, Fe, V, Mn, Ti and Cl, allowe
d us to attribute Pakistan emeralds, Taiwan flux emeralds, Biron hydrotherm
al emeralds and Biron hydrothermal emeralds measured at the boundary, and L
echleitner emeralds. This PCA together with the study of the correlation of
the three chromophoric elements, Cr, Fe and V, allowed us to attribute Col
ombian and Pakistan emeralds and all synthetic emeralds, which was useful a
nd convenient in real-life testing of unknown emeralds. Copyright (C) 2000
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.