M. Maniscalco et al., The effect of platelet-activating factor (PAF) on nasal airway resistance in healthy subjects is not mediated by nitric oxide, ALLERGY, 55(8), 2000, pp. 757-761
Background: The nose is an important source of nitric oxide (NO) in man, bu
t the relevance of NO production to the response to inflammatory mediators
is not clear.
Methods: In this study, we evaluated the effect of NO inhibition on nasal a
irway resistance (NAR) at baseline, after an acute challenge with platelet-
activating factor (PAF), a potent proinflammatory factor, and after an acut
e challenge with bradykinin (BK), both of which are mediators of allergic r
hinitis in man. Eight healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Nasal NO
production was measured by the chemiluminescence method, and NAR was measu
red by active anterior rhinomanometry.
Results: Basal nasal NO concentration was 500.6 +/- 115.6 ppb; it significa
ntly decreased after topical administration of the NO-synthase inhibitor L-
NAME, and the NO-synthase substrate L-arginine caused a recovery in NO prod
uction. The administration of L-NAME did not cause any change in basal NAR.
In a double-blind fashion, we pel formed nasal challenge with PAF and BK a
fter topical pretreatment with either placebo or L-NAME. After placebo pret
reatment, both PAI; and BK caused a significant increase in NAR(respectivel
y from 0.29 +/- 0.11 Pa s cm(-3) to 0.75 +/- 0.21 Pa s cm(-3), and from 0.3
6 +/- 0.18 Pa s cm(-3) to 0.71 +/- 0.25 Pa s cm(-3); P < 0.001, n = 8). Pre
treatment with L-NAME did not prevent the PAF-induced increase in NAR (from
0.31 +/- 0.10 Pa s cm(-3) to 0.71 +/-0.27 Pa s cm(-3)), whereas it prevent
ed the BK-induced increase in NAR (from 0.33 +/- 0.15 Pa s cm(-3) to 0.33 /- 0.16 Pa s cm(-3)).
Conclusions: Topical administration of the NO-synthase inhibitor L-NAME at
doses sufficient to decrease NO nasal production does not prevent the PAF-i
nduced increase in NAR, indicating that NO generation in vivo is not involv
ed in the nasal response to PAF.