OBJECTIVE: Despite recently published national guidelines, many physicians
have only limited knowledge about Helicobacter pylori infection. We conduct
ed this study to assess internal medicine residents' knowledge about H. pyl
ori.
METHODS: Two hundred and nineteen residents in seven accredited internal me
dicine training programs completed a self-administered questionnaire on per
sonal demographics and practices related to testing for-and treating-H. pyl
ori infection.
RESULTS: Noon conferences (82%), ward teaching (66%), journals (70%), and s
ponsored symposia (27%) were their major sources of H. pylori-related infor
mation. Forty-eight percent had used office-based tests for the infection.
Testing for (and treatment of) Helicobacter pylori infection was recommende
d by 97% (97%) for newly diagnosed duodenal ulcer, but by only 61% (63%) fo
r a past history of duodenal ulcer. Many recommended testing in unproven co
nditions and might not have offered treatment to an infected patient. A pro
ton pump inhibitor-based triple-drug regimen was the treatment of first cho
ice of 55%; 20% recommended proton pump inhibitor-based dual regimens. Sixt
y-six percent and 80%, respectively, underestimated the rates of resistance
to clarithromycin and metronidazole. In the absence of gastrointestinal sy
mptoms, 22% would have ordered Helicobacter pylori testing but only 33% of
these would undergo treatment if positive.
CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents usually test for Helicobacter pylo
ri infection in appropriate conditions, but may not always treat the infect
ion when the result is positive. Most use efficacious treatment regimens al
though many have inaccurate knowledge of resistance rates, which may advers
ely influence prescribing. Education should focus on practical issues surro
unding Helicobacter pylori testing and treatment such as those contained in
the American College of Gastroenterology's 1998 practice guidelines. (C) 2
000 by Am. Cell. of Gastroenterology.