Effect of pretreatment with intrathecal excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists on the development of pain behavior caused by plantar incision

Citation
Em. Pogatzki et al., Effect of pretreatment with intrathecal excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists on the development of pain behavior caused by plantar incision, ANESTHESIOL, 93(2), 2000, pp. 489-496
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANESTHESIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00033022 → ACNP
Volume
93
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
489 - 496
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(200008)93:2<489:EOPWIE>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Background: Drugs that block spinal excitatory amino add receptor activatio n may prevent pain after surgery. The authors previously studied the effect of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists after incision. In the prese nt study, we examined the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), non-NMDA, an d metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) on the development of pain beha vior after plantar incision. Methods: Rats with lumbar intrathecal catheters were anesthetized with halo thane. Fifteen minutes before an Incision was made, drug [40 nmol MK-801; 2 0 nmol NBQX; or 200 nmol (+)-MCPG] or vehicle was injected intrathecally fo llowed by an infusion of the same drug for 75 min. Withdrawal thresholds to calibrated von Frey filaments applied adjacent to the wound and response f requencies to a blunt mechanical stimulus applied directly to the wound wer e measured before incision and 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after incision and then onc e daily for 6 days. Results: Preincision treatments with antagonists against the NMDA (Mg-801) and group I and II metabotropic receptors [(+)-MCPG] did not inhibit the de velopment of mechanical hyperalgesia caused by incision. Preincision treatm ent with the non-NMDA receptor antagonist NBQX increased withdrawal thresho lds at 1 and 2 h and on postoperative day 1 compared with the vehicle group ; response frequencies were reduced 1 and 2 h after incision and on postope rative day 2 (P < 0.05). In an additional group, postincision treatment wit h NBQX was similar to preincision treatment. Conclusion: Spinal NMDA and mGluR antagonists may not be useful for prevent ing postsurgical pain. Spinal non-NMDA receptor antagonists reduced pain be haviors, but a preventive effect using preincision treatment was not appare nt.