T. Defechereux et al., Hypnosedation: a new anesthesia technique for cervical endocrine surgery. A prospective randomized study., ANN CHIR, 125(6), 2000, pp. 539-546
Retrospective studies have confirmed the feasibility and safety of thyroid
and parathyroid procedures performed under hypnoanesthesia (hypnosis, local
anesthesia and minimal conscious sedation) as sole method of anesthesia. T
his very effective technique seems to provide physiological, psychological
and economic benefits for the patient.
Study aim: To assess, by means of a prospective randomized study, the advan
tages of hypnosedation as an alternative to general anesthesia in terms of
clinical and laboratory parameters.
Patients and methods: Twenty patients operated under hypnoanesthesia were c
ompared to 20 patients operated under conventional anesthesia. The two grou
ps were compared in terms of inflammatory, neuroendocrine, hemodynamic and
immunologic parameters and postoperative course (pain, fatigue, muscle stre
ngth and stress).
Results: No clinical or demographic differences were observed between the t
wo groups. Operative times, bleeding, weight of specimens, and surgical com
fort were similar. Significant differences in terms of inflammatory respons
e and hemodynamic parameters were observed in favor of hypnoanesthesia. Neu
roendocrine and immunological parameters were similar. Patients of the hypn
oanesthesia group had significantly less postoperative pain. Postoperative
fatigue syndrome and convalescence were significantly improved in these pat
ients.
Conclusion: This study confirms that, in our hands, hypnosedation presents
real advantages over general anesthesia, in patients undergoing thyroid sur
gery. (C) 2000 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.