What do trainees think about advanced trauma life support (ATLS)?

Citation
B. Campbell et al., What do trainees think about advanced trauma life support (ATLS)?, ANN RC SURG, 82(4), 2000, pp. 263-267
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND
ISSN journal
00358843 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
263 - 267
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-8843(200007)82:4<263:WDTTAA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Advanced trauma life support (ATLS) has become a desirable or even essentia l part of training for many surgeons and anaesthetists, but aspects of the ATLS course have attracted criticism. In the absence of published data on t he views of trainees, this study sought their opinions in a structured ques tionnaire, which was completed by trainees in accident and emergency (A & E ) (26), anaesthetic (82), general surgical (26), orthopaedic (42) and other (5) posts in different hospitals (response rate 66%). Of the trainees, 78% had done an ATLS course and, of these, 83% considered ATLS a 'major advantage' or 'essential' for practising their proposed speci alty - 100% for A & E, 94% for orthopaedics, 92% for general surgery, and 7 5% for anaesthetics. ATLS was considered a major curriculum vitae (CV) adva ntage by 94%, 85%, 50%, and 45%, respectively. Over 90% had positive attitu des towards ATLS, and 74% selected 'genuine improvement of management of tr auma patients' as the most important reason for doing the course: 93% thoug ht ATLS saved lives. Of the respondents, 83% thought that all existing consultants dealing with trauma patients should have done the course, and 41% thought it offered maj or advantages to doctors not involved in trauma. Funding problems for ATLS courses had been experienced by 14% trainees. Thi s survey has shown that most trainees view ATLS positively. They believe th at it provides genuine practical benefit for patients, and very few regard ATLS primarily as a career advantage or mandate.