Advanced trauma life support (ATLS) has become a desirable or even essentia
l part of training for many surgeons and anaesthetists, but aspects of the
ATLS course have attracted criticism. In the absence of published data on t
he views of trainees, this study sought their opinions in a structured ques
tionnaire, which was completed by trainees in accident and emergency (A & E
) (26), anaesthetic (82), general surgical (26), orthopaedic (42) and other
(5) posts in different hospitals (response rate 66%).
Of the trainees, 78% had done an ATLS course and, of these, 83% considered
ATLS a 'major advantage' or 'essential' for practising their proposed speci
alty - 100% for A & E, 94% for orthopaedics, 92% for general surgery, and 7
5% for anaesthetics. ATLS was considered a major curriculum vitae (CV) adva
ntage by 94%, 85%, 50%, and 45%, respectively. Over 90% had positive attitu
des towards ATLS, and 74% selected 'genuine improvement of management of tr
auma patients' as the most important reason for doing the course: 93% thoug
ht ATLS saved lives.
Of the respondents, 83% thought that all existing consultants dealing with
trauma patients should have done the course, and 41% thought it offered maj
or advantages to doctors not involved in trauma.
Funding problems for ATLS courses had been experienced by 14% trainees. Thi
s survey has shown that most trainees view ATLS positively. They believe th
at it provides genuine practical benefit for patients, and very few regard
ATLS primarily as a career advantage or mandate.