In contrast to absence and turnover, the relevant antecedents that would le
ad an individual to arrive late at work have not yet been clearly presented
in one model. This article suggests a two-stage formulation with attitudes
triggering one track, and other antecedents including personality, commuti
ng-related variables, culture, and work-family conflict serving to influenc
e a second source of lateness. Furthermore, the model integrates some of th
e ideas usually included in a progression model by delineating a process th
at links the various types of withdrawal measures. Finally, the article des
cribes another set of variables, minor withdrawal behaviours, which are har
d for management to detect but may serve as a behavioural antecedent of emp
loyee lateness.