Context: In a climate of growing concern about costs of health care, profes
sional accountability, and the effectiveness and efficiency of treatment, n
eurologists should understand measures of health-related quality of life (H
RQoL) and appreciate both their values and their limits.
Objective: To provide a critical review of current concepts in the measurem
ent of HRQoL, with particular emphasis on those pertaining to neurologic co
nditions.
Design: A selective overview of measurement strategies and specific instrum
ents.
Setting: Clinical and research settings.
Participants: Special attention to people with such conditions as multiple
sclerosis and Parkinson disease.
Main Outcome Measures; The utility and relevance to neurologists of availab
le measures of HRQoL.
Results: There are both generic and condition- or disease-specific measures
of HRQoL. Though many measures do not elicit response or are even offensiv
e to people with such conditions as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson diseas
e, other measures pertain directly to their circumstances and needs.
Conclusions: Measures of HRQoL are both meaningful and relevant to neurolog
ists. However, they must be refined-enabled-and used in combinations to add
ress the clinical and existential realities of many neurologic conditions.