Policies and procedures related to weak D phenotype testing and Rh immune globulin administration - Results from supplementary questions to the Comprehensive Transfusion Medicine Survey of the College of American Pathologists
Re. Domen, Policies and procedures related to weak D phenotype testing and Rh immune globulin administration - Results from supplementary questions to the Comprehensive Transfusion Medicine Survey of the College of American Pathologists, ARCH PATH L, 124(8), 2000, pp. 1118-1121
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Objective.-To determine and evaluate policies and procedures related to wea
k D phenotype testing and terminology and the administration of Rh immune g
lobulin in selected clinical situations.
Design, Setting, and Participants.-Institutions participating in the Colleg
e of American Pathologists 1999 J-A Comprehensive Transfusion Medicine Surv
ey program were asked to respond to a series of supplementary questions rel
ated to weak D phenotype testing and Rh immune globulin administration. Mor
e than 3500 institutions and transfusion services participated.
Results.-Most supplementary questions elicited more than 3000 responses. De
spite no clinical or regulatory mandate, 58.2% of transfusion services rout
inely perform an antiglobulin test for the weak D phenotype in patients who
test negative with anti-D reagents. Significant differences were found con
cerning the transfusion of blood components to patients with the weak D phe
notype and the administration of Rh immune globulin to these individuals. A
t least one patient with the weak D phenotype with anti-D alloantibody form
ation was observed during a 12-month period by 31.8% of transfusion service
s.
Conclusions.-Significant variability concerning policies and procedures rel
ated to weak D typing and terminology was found in this survey. Transfusion
of blood components to patients with the weak D phenotype and the administ
ration of Rh immune globulin also demonstrated variations. Anti-D alloantib
ody formation by patients with the weak D phenotype may not be as rare as p
reviously thought. Additional study related to the clinical significance of
these results is warranted.