We compared a noninvasive serological test using a commercial immunoblot as
say (Helicoblot 2.0) to tissue-based methods [rapid urease test (CLO test),
histology and culture] in eighty Thai patients undergoing upper endoscopy.
A true positive test was defined as at least two of the biopsy-related tes
ts being positive. The CLO test was the most accurate test with sensitivity
and specificity as high as 100%, whereas histology and culture had sensiti
vity of 100% and 72.2%, respectively, and the specificity of 72.7% and 96%,
respectively. The serological test had a high sensitivity (97.2%) but exhi
bited an unsatisfactory specificity (40.9%). We concluded that the rapid ur
ease test using multiple gastric biopsies was the most appropriate method f
or diagnosing H. pylori status. The role of immunoblot assay as a serologic
al screening test in our population remains doubtful, but it may identify p
atients who have been infected with certain strains of H. pylori.