To conserve biodiversity, complementary approaches are necessary. Besides u
sing museum data from sightings and specimens, the knowledge of experts can
also be employed. Often such valuable information is lost on retirement or
death. To investigate the value of this knowledge for nature conservation
planning, we sent questionnaires to 124 professional conservationists in th
e province of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Fifty-two replies illustrated th
at the historical context biases our concepts of nature and the conservatio
n of biodiversity. Despite an awareness of all the spatial scales, complexi
ties and dynamics of nature, there is still a strong focus on large-sized a
nimals and visibly discrete ecosystems, such as wetlands. Nevertheless, the
respondents illustrated that an awareness of infrequently-seen and less we
ll known organisms is increasing. Harnessing this expert knowledge was valu
able for conservation planning, but had the weakness that many taxa and loc
alities were neglected. Similar problems arose with data from museum specim
ens. However, both these approaches were synergistic and highlighted the ge
ographical areas that need far more exploration of their biodiversity. Such
information gathering is an important ethical and practical exercise for c
onserving biodiversity.