G. Berlucchi et al., RIGHTWARD ATTENTIONAL BIAS AND LEFT-HEMISPHERE DOMINANCE IN A CUE-TARGET LIGHT DETECTION TASK IN A CALLOSOTOMY PATIENT, Neuropsychologia, 35(7), 1997, pp. 941-952
Six normal subjects and a callosotomized man with a prefrontal lesion,
mostly on the right side, were tested in a reaction time (RT) task in
volving a key-pressing response to an extrafoveal light target precede
d by an extrafoveal light cue. Cues and targets were presented along t
he horizontal meridian at 4 degrees and 12 degrees on the right and le
ft of fixation. Fixation was maintained throughout each trial. The cue
signalled the occurrence of the target within a lime window extending
from 200 to 4000 msec from the cue, but did not predict target locati
on. Normal controls responded faster to medial than to lateral targets
in both fields, but showed no between-held difference, and their RT w
as not affected by cue location. Furthermore, they showed the so-calle
d 'ipsilateral inhibition' or 'inhibition of return' effect, their RT
being longer when cues and targets occurred in the same field than whe
n they occurred in opposite fields. The RT of the callosotomized subje
ct showed a left-right gradient for both cue location and target locat
ion, being longest for the leftmost location and shortest for the righ
t locations. In addition, he showed a significant advantage for the ri
ght hand regardless of cue and target location, as well as a consisten
t ipsilateral inhibition in the left field, whereas in the right field
there was ipsilateral inhibition only at the two longest stimulus ons
et asynchronies. These results suggest that, at least under these expe
rimental conditions, there was a rightward orientational bias which re
flected the taking over of the control of performance by the left hemi
sphere. This attentional bias was reminiscent of that seen in patients
with hemi-inattention from right hemisphere damage, although the call
osotomized patient showed no sign of such hemi-inattention in routine
clinical tests. On the basis of several considerations the rightward b
ias could be attributed to the callosal interhemispheric disconnection
rather than to the right prefrontal lesion. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science
Ltd.